Page 1 of 9

UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:37 pm
by -=IOC{zero}IG=-
Tonight, SF and UFP have come into our TS and challenged us into multiple games in 1VS1 duels, Bridge commander included.
As Hawkeye stated, in games like Cod4, or Battlefield BC2, We dont mind if they wanna come and do small skirmishes (Its not like they got a server to invade anyway), However, BC will remains as it is, We are fighting a War, and in wars, There is no such things as duels. THere is no rules, anythign goes.

Further more, There sudden arrivel in our TS and imposed Challenges are nothing more TO IOC's eyes But a mere Revelation of SF-UFP alliance's signs of Weaknesse. Clearly they know they are not Doing well In the BC War, And we all know how UFP-SF cries when they get pwned saying "Id own you 1 on 1"(wich i hardly beleive they can) And now since they know there Adding up Defeats after defeats, they have attempted to change the Way of the war into there Favor, In other words, Thye want it to Work their Way, rather then an All out battle, Like a Real War is suposed to be fought

CAn we say They surrendered the War but open Small Skirmishes instead? Sure does sounds like it right?

Image

Re: UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:43 pm
by EVOXSNES
Just what are you claiming exactly?

[UFP] stands by its allies when facing the scourge of the community at large.

Its was a display of strength. [UFP] is committed to its war with IOC in every sense in Bridge Commander or any other Star Trek game that has the foundation to stand [UFP]s mighty presence.

[SF] made the challenges as discussed on your server to engage you in fronts that [UFP] has no presence in. [UFP] whilst not supporting non star trek games still supports its allies regardless of the theater of war.. wherever it may be.

Re: UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:01 pm
by EVOXSNES
Furthermore. Amongst all the challenges was the commitment from Hawkeye that IOC will be engaging [UFP] / [SF] forces in BC right away. We've been waiting here in BC with our allies [SF] for 20 minutes and still nothing.

Challenges etc are made, you agree on TS to engage [UFP]/[SF] in BC at this time. TS is as close to fact-to-face that you can get.

At this time, No IOC presence what so ever. Its now 25 minutes on my clock and still nothing.

Re: UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:09 pm
by -=IOC{zero}IG=-
EVOXSNES wrote: [SF] made the challenges as discussed on your server to engage you in fronts that [UFP] has no presence in. [UFP] whilst not supporting non star trek games still supports its allies regardless of the theater of war.. wherever it may be.
THere for you Are admiting You have No Presence In Bridge commander? because the challenge Was Issued for BC as well and the few of your member that show sup didnt happen to have any objections with it

SF's Challenges were not a Display of strenght, And the Few members of UFP who got on our TS was not either. i Don't see wheres Strenght When you wish to bend the Rules of War Like this
NOr do i see any strenght in 2 CLan joining together only to be utterly defeated in Game In BC by IOC. i mena...Fail really

IOC Stated to Keep the Battles The same way as it has always been In BC, Never have we Said we will immidietly join the battle, i would be Glad to kick your Butts right now, But i got banking Paperwork to fill in sadly.

Re: UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:23 pm
by Silverado
UFP and SF are still sitting in the bridge commander server waiting on you TARDS to show up.

Re: UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:30 pm
by delta
Honestly, I am sick of your shit. I want to take a bat, wrap it in barbed wire and shove it up your vaginas. Please do us the favor of getting the shroombuck off our glorious forums.

Re: UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:50 pm
by EVOXSNES
As i said. We where there to reaffirm [UFP]s commitment to the war and to its allies and to furthermore support our allies in their official revelation in the form of challenges in said games that [UFP], by choice, has no presence in.

[UFP] and [SF] has been waiting a full 90 minutes on a [UFP] Space server casually enjoying friendly competition whilst you show one again your cowardly nature to the community at large.

Excuses and the distortion of facts is all i see. Im sick of dealing with you already as i've destroyed every pathetic ill conceived rebuttal you've made.

Good Day. ohh and we're still waiting...

Re: UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:53 pm
by Hightower
Ohhhhhh its so nice that you have turned up at last. Waiting for you lot is like waiting for a bus!!

Re: UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:46 pm
by Church
Dude, I hadn't played in two years, and other UFP members, SF forces, and I kicked Cartman's and 10lives's asses along with some other wretch whose name I can't be bothered to remember. Go back and play in your sandbox and leave Bridge Commander to the big kids in the community.

Re: UFP-SF Alliance Shows Signs of Weaknesse

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:50 pm
by -=IOC{zero}IG=-
We did showed up, sorry for the Delay, i was busy With the Girlfriend and the paper Work, but again we showed up, And we kiced you asses AGAIN, We even got screen shot of Silverado using an excalibur, the ship you seem to frown above all, ANd he got insta popped his sensors in a matter of seconds, he then SD,
Janeway also Sded after he got pwned, And then UFP and SF left,

Another Victory for IOC beside so many others, Now i understadn why you say 1 vs1 duels are fun for you, seems full combat aint fun when you get pwn all the time :P

BTW screenies will be posted on our boards shortly